Editorial Board
NADT Journals maintains a transparent and academically rigorous editorial structure to ensure quality, integrity, and fairness in scholarly publishing.
Editorial & Review Process
All manuscripts undergo editorial screening followed by a structured double-blind peer review. Decisions are based on academic merit, originality, and relevance.
- Initial editorial assessment
- Double-blind peer review
- Editorial decision and revision
- Final acceptance and publication
Advisory Board
The Advisory Board provides strategic guidance on journal policy, scope, and long-term academic direction.
- Senior academicians and researchers
- Guidance on ethical publishing
- Support for quality enhancement
Editorial Board Members
Provides academic leadership and final publication decisions.
Coordinate peer review and recommend editorial actions.
Oversee manuscripts in specific subject areas.
Reviewers
Reviewers are selected based on subject expertise and research experience. Their identities remain confidential under the double-blind review system.
- Objective and unbiased evaluation
- Strict confidentiality
- Conflict-of-interest disclosure